Why are Air India and IndiGo chasing lifestyle partnerships now?
In brief
Air India and IndiGo are expanding their loyalty programmes into broad commercial ecosystems, signing partnerships across banking, hotels, car rental and retail that connect everyday spending with the act of flying. In mature aviation markets, airlines used these ecosystems to do far more than retain customers. They raised capital, increased strategic flexibility and created assets that investors and lenders could value independently of the airline. Air India and IndiGo have not reached that stage. Based on current evidence, they are still building the commercial foundations of those ecosystems. The clearest sign that this is changing would be a structural separation of either programme, whether through an equity carve-out, an outside investment or financing backed by loyalty cash flows. Historically, that has been the step that transformed a loyalty programme from a customer retention tool into a recognised financial asset.
Read the full analysis as a PDF or continue reading below
Why are Air India and IndiGo expanding their loyalty ecosystems now?
The recent partnership announcements are better read as a single build-out than as a series of separate items. Air India relaunched its frequent-flyer scheme as Maharaja Club in 2024, folding in the former Flying Returns and Club Vistara programmes and connecting the result to the Tata group's Tata Neu platform, with roughly 25 new lifestyle partners added in the year to March 2024. IndiGo launched BluChip in late 2024 alongside an HDFC Bank co-brand card and partners including the hotel group Accor, and reported passing two million members within about six months, across more than fifty partner brands. Taken one at a time each tie-up is incremental; taken together they widen the range of everyday transactions that earn airline currency, which is the feature that distinguishes a loyalty ecosystem from a conventional frequent-flyer scheme. Both carriers are assembling these ecosystems at the same moment, and the timing follows from the scale of the customer base now available to them.
Figure 1. Foundations of airline loyalty growth in India
Figure 1 shows two markets expanding together rather than independently. More people are flying, and more consumers are using credit cards, creating the conditions loyalty programmes depend on. Airlines need members who both travel frequently and spend beyond the ticket, while banks need large pools of engaged cardholders. That overlap has only recently reached sufficient scale in India, helping explain why airlines are now expanding their partner ecosystems rather than treating loyalty as a standalone frequent-flyer programme. The remaining question is why those members are commercially more valuable than simply carrying another passenger.
Why is a loyal member worth more than another passenger?
A loyalty member is worth more than a one-time passenger because the member generates revenue repeatedly, and from sources beyond the ticket. When a cardholder earns airline points through everyday spending, the issuing bank purchases those points from the airline. The airline receives cash when the points are sold, while the member may not redeem them until months or years later. Hotel, retail and car-rental partners operate on the same principle, purchasing points that are then awarded to their own customers. This turns a single transaction, the fare, into a stream of payments that continues across years and across categories of spending. Measured over the life of the relationship, that stream can exceed the thin margin an airline earns on any individual seat, which is why carriers increasingly treat the member, rather than the flight, as the unit worth acquiring.
The same structure raises the cost to the member of moving to a competitor. Accumulated points, earned status and partner benefits are tied to one programme and are given up when a traveller switches airlines. A member holding a balance of points and a status tier will often accept a small fare premium to preserve them, which makes that member's demand less sensitive to price. In the Indian market this protection carries commercial weight, because real domestic fares have fallen to around a fifth below their 2011 level in inflation-adjusted terms, leaving carriers with little room to compete on headline price alone. Loyalty gives an airline a way to hold a customer that does not depend on being the cheapest on the route.
Beyond cash and retention, the programme gives the airline ownership of the customer relationship itself. Each partner transaction records what a member buys, where and when, information the carrier would never see from ticket sales alone. That record allows the airline to market to the member directly and to price with precision, and it is ultimately the asset that banks and retailers are paying to reach. An airline that owns this relationship is no longer only selling seats; it is running a business whose revenue and data can be measured on their own terms. That characteristic is what, in several other markets, allowed a loyalty programme to be valued and financed as a distinct enterprise, which is the development the next section traces.
How have airlines actually converted loyalty programmes into capital?
Airlines have unlocked value from mature loyalty programmes through several different financial structures. Some borrowed against predictable loyalty cash flows while retaining ownership. Others sold minority stakes through public listings or created separately listed subsidiaries that investors could value independently. The mechanism differed in each case, but each treated the loyalty programme as something capable of attracting capital beyond the airline's core flying business. Figure 2 summarises the principal approaches used.
Figure 2 shows three different routes to the same outcome, which is turning a loyalty programme into a source of capital without giving up strategic control of how members earned and redeemed points.
1. United, Delta and American raised debt using their loyalty programmes as collateral, which was the clearest case shown during the pandemic. In every case the airline kept control of the programme and continued to decide how members earned and redeemed points. The difference was that the programme's future cash flows were separated from the airline's wider business and used to support the borrowing. The key was not simply having millions of members, but creating a structure lenders were prepared to finance.
2. Air Canada raised equity by listing part of Aeroplan. Air Canada floated Aeroplan in 2005, raising about C$250 million in an initial public offering while Aeroplan continued as the airline's exclusive loyalty operator. The listing placed an external, market-tested valuation on the programme and brought in cash, yet Air Canada retained control of the commercial rules that governed how members earned and spent. Ownership was shared; direction was not surrendered.
3. while Gol gave Smiles its own public listing and investor base. Brazil's Gol operated Smiles as a separately listed subsidiary in which it held a majority stake, giving the programme its own share price, its own disclosures and its own investor base while leaving strategic control with the airline. The mechanism differed from a bond and from a one-off share sale, but the effect on control was the same
None of these airlines created value simply by having more members. They first created a structure that investors or lenders could finance. The question for India is therefore not how large Maharaja Club or BluChip become, but whether either programme is ever given a comparable structure. India has already run a version of that experiment once, and the next section explains it.
How the Jet Airways experience illustrates India’s experience of monetising loyalty?
India has already tested one form of loyalty monetisation with Jet Airways’ JetPrivilege- JetPrivilege too along with codeshare partners and loyalty partnerships with airlines, it had also operated various lifestyle partnerships across retail, hotels, and banking. In 2014 Jet Airways sold a 50.1 per cent stake in Jet Privilege to Etihad Airways for around US$150 million, valuing the programme at roughly US$300 million. The transaction raised capital and established an external valuation, but it also transferred majority ownership outside the airline. When Jet later ran into financial distress, one of its most valuable assets could no longer be independently pledged, sold or restructured because control rested elsewhere. The programme survived as InterMiles after the airline collapsed, illustrating how ownership decisions can shape an airline's financial flexibility long after the original transaction.
What would it signal that Air India and IndiGo’s loyalty programmes are being strategic and financial assets?
Measured by ownership rather than partnerships, both programmes currently remain at an early stage. Maharaja Club and BluChip are fully integrated within their parent airlines, with no separate legal entity, no outside investor and no standalone financial reporting. In that respect they differ fundamentally from Jet Privilege after 2014, and from the structures used by United, Air Canada and Gol to unlock external capital. Current evidence therefore suggests Air India and IndiGo are building loyalty ecosystems rather than financial assets.
Three developments would suggest that Indian airline loyalty programmes are moving beyond customer retention and towards becoming profitable assets that can be used to generate capital beyond the airline core business.
The first would be the creation of a separate legal entity for either programme. Separating the loyalty business from the airline would make its revenues, liabilities and performance easier to assess on their own, while creating the legal structure that has supported financing and equity transactions in other markets.
The second would be the arrival of outside capital, whether through a minority investment or an equity carve-out. An external investor would do more than provide funding. It would establish an independent market view of what the programme is worth, rather than leaving that value embedded within the airline's overall business.
The third would be a financing secured against the programme's own cash flows. That would indicate lenders viewed the loyalty business as predictable enough to support borrowing independently of the airline's operating assets. None of these developments appears imminent today. But each has marked an important stage in the evolution of mature loyalty programmes elsewhere, making them the clearest signals to watch in India over the coming years.
Closing thoughts
Air India and IndiGo are expanding the reach of their loyalty programmes. Every partnership with a bank, hotel, retailer or consumer brand creates another opportunity for members to earn and redeem points while generating revenue beyond the ticket. The result is a broader commercial ecosystem with more members, more partners and more data.
Today, both Maharaja Club and BluChip remain fully integrated within their parent airlines. Neither programme has a separate legal entity, an external investor or financing secured against its own cash flows. The programmes are growing commercially, but they continue to sit inside the airline rather than alongside it.
International experience shows that loyalty programmes entered a different phase once airlines gave them a legal and financial structure that investors or lenders could evaluate independently. United, Delta and American raised debt against their programmes. Air Canada and Gol attracted outside equity. Jet Airways demonstrated that ownership decisions continue to shape a programme's strategic value long after the original transaction.
The next milestone for Air India and IndiGo is therefore unlikely to be measured by another partnership announcement or another million members. It will come when either airline restructures its loyalty programme in a way that allows outside capital to value or finance it independently. That would represent the next stage in the evolution of airline loyalty in India.
Author’s Note and About Aeraltus
This analysis is based on public information including public statements, DGCA monthly statistics, OEM market projections and analysis, and Aeraltus prior analysis. Aeraltus does not hold a position in Air India, IndiGo, or any related entity.
Aeraltus produces structural aviation analysis and intelligence on emerging markets across Indian subcontinent, ASEAN and Africa. Custom analysis is available for institutional investors, airline strategy teams, lessors and corporate development groups. Contact info@aeraltus.com.
Sources
Refer to the PDF attached above for a full list of references
